the affective fallacy wimsatt and beardsley pdf files

The meaning of test is public, not personal. Wimsatt and Breadsley view that text constitutes language. Theories of catharsis, therapy, didacticism etc, fall under the affective fallacy because they judge the poem in terms of its effect on the reader. As a result of this fallacy, criticism ends in impressionism and relativism and objective criticism becomes almost impossible. It is a way of deriving meaning of the text interims of affect of product up on the reader.Īffective fallacy is the error of evaluating a text by its effect. Affective fallacy means the confusion between the poem and its result. The meaning, structure, value of text is inherent with in the work of art itself it is an object with certain autonomy. They claim that author's intended meaning is irrelevant to the literary critic. The critic should not interpret the allusion in terms of author’s intention. Author can't control the text as soon as he writes. But for Wimsatt and Beardsley criticism should be objective and textual, critic should not go beyond the text. If a critic interprets text in terms of author’s biography, this interpretation is called subjective interpretation or criticism. Fonologia-Sintassi-Prova d'ingresso-Libro vacanza.

BEARDSLEY We might as well study the properties of wine by get ting drunk?Eduard Hanslick. It is the fallacy because an author is not the part of the text instead, text is public but not private. International fallacy means the confusion between the poem and its origin.

The affective fallacy wimsatt and beardsley pdf files